<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maine Women&#039;s Lobby Blog &#187; Women&#8217;s Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/category/womens-leadership/feed/?q=blog%2Fcategory%2Fwomens-leadership%2Ffeed%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs</link>
	<description>The Voice of Maine Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:17:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jobz v. skool</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/05/jobz-v-skool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/05/jobz-v-skool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helpful Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Women's Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the legislature voted to pass an amended version of L.D. 516 – increasing the number of hours a teen can work during the school week. The amended bill represents a very significant improvement over the initial bill that, as written, would have removed all hourly protections for teen workers, but &#8211; to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last  week, the legislature voted to pass an amended version of L.D. 516 –  increasing the number of hours a teen can work during the school week.</p>
<p>The amended bill represents a very  significant improvement over the initial bill that, as written, would  have removed <strong>all</strong> hourly protections for teen workers, but &#8211; to be clear &#8211; it still represents a roll back to workplace protections for teens.</p>
<p>Read below for a statement from Laura Harper, our Director of Public Policy, on the vote:</p>
<p>“This law will take Maine in the wrong  direction. At a time when Maine desperately needs to be creating jobs  and a skilled workforce, we are undermining student success.</p>
<p>&#8220;Volumes of research demonstrate that  once teens work over 20 hours a week, drop-out rates and even substance  abuse rates increase. Further, studies show that the more hours teens  work the more likely it is that their grades will decline.</p>
<p>&#8220;Adults need jobs. Teens need success in  school to make a good living down the road. We urge lawmakers to put  focus where it’s needed—creating jobs, increasing access to education,  and sparking economic growth that will benefit kids, families, and our  state.”</p>
<p><a href="../../../../../2011/05/put-focus-where-its-needed/" target="_blank">You can read her whole statement here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The silver lining</strong>: We were  successful in defeating L.D. 1346 (a bill that would have both increased  the total number of hours a teen could work and create a sub-minimum  wage for teen workers) and greatly modifying L.D. 516.</p>
<p><strong>The truth</strong>: We couldn’t have done it without you! You and your friends, and your friends’ friends, sent a total of <strong>860 emails and petition signatures</strong>, made phone calls, and showed up to the public hearings.</p>
<p>Your action helped kill L.D. 1346, and make L.D. 516 less extreme. So, THANK YOU!</p>
<p><a href="../../../../../2011/05/round-up-child-labor/" target="_blank">Click here to check out some of the fantastic news coverage of the campaign</a> (including some goodies from Rachel Maddow, and our own Laura Harper in the Huffington Post).</p>
<p>And, please take a minute right now to check out how your <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/rollcall.asp?ID=280039664&amp;chamber=Senate&amp;serialnumber=52" target="_blank">Senator</a> and <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/LawMakerWeb/rollcall.asp?ID=280039664&amp;chamber=House&amp;serialnumber=59" target="_blank">Representative</a> voted on L.D. 516, and share your appreciation &#8211; or disapproval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/05/jobz-v-skool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s the skinny</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/05/heres-the-skinny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/05/heres-the-skinny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 16:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alliance for a Clean and Healthy Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor LaPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Women's Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roll Call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feeling blue about the state of affairs in Augusta these days? I hear ya (although it might also be the rain). That’s why I’m writing to you today. Believe it or not, we have A LOT to celebrate. Thanks to you, and your calls, emails, and visits to the State House we have &#8211; together [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="14" cellpadding="0" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="517" align="left" valign="top">Feeling blue about the state of affairs in Augusta these days? I hear ya (although it might also be the rain).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/photo-1-13.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2595" title="photo (1) (1)" src="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/photo-1-13-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>That’s why I’m writing to you today.</p>
<p>Believe it or not, we have A LOT to celebrate. Thanks to you, and your calls, emails, and visits to the State House we have &#8211; together &#8211; successfully defeated (and in some cases diminished) a myriad of dangerous roll-back proposals.</p>
<p>Here’s the skinny:</p>
<p><strong>Child Labor</strong>: L.D. 1346, a bill to implement a sub-minimum wage for teen workers and eliminate hour-caps on teen labor during the school week, was killed in committee. L.D. 516, a bill to increase the number of hours a week a teen can work, is currently awaiting action in the House, but with much less drastic language. We still must work hard to defeat this bill but this amendment points us in the right direction.</p>
<p><strong>Safe Chemicals</strong>: Attempts to roll back Maine’s Kid-Safe Products act were defeated, as lawmakers reached an agreeable compromise. And, the ban on the toxic chemical BPA was passed with near-unanimous support from the legislature and without the Governor’s signature!</p>
<p><strong>Human Rights</strong>: The Judiciary Committee voted Friday &#8220;ought not to pass&#8221; on a bill to roll back human rights protections for transgendered Mainers – leaving Maine’s Human Rights Act intact! We still need to work hard to hold the line on the floor vote.</p>
<p><strong>Reproductive Freedom</strong>: On Friday, the Judiciary Committee also voted &#8220;ought not to pass&#8221; on four anti-choice bills: a bill requiring parental consent for contraception, one requiring parental consent for abortion, one requiring a 24-hour waiting period, and one that would require doctors to read a biased and coercive script to a patient 24 hours before she could obtain an abortion. This vote was a victory for Maine&#8217;s longstanding, bipartisan tradition of reproductive privacy.</p>
<p><strong>So, we have a lot to celebrate, AND a lot of work left to do.</p>
<p></strong>Despite the good news for reproductive freedom reported out of the Judiciary Committee on Friday, we expect a contentious floor debate on all four of these anti-choice bills. Believe me, our lobbyist is working hard, but she needs your help!</p>
<p><a title="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=58hm5j6BKRNLEcvA0nM%2F7X95BanqqOPO" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=58hm5j6BKRNLEcvA0nM%2F7X95BanqqOPO" target="_blank">Please email your legislator now and tell them to vote NO on all four of these anti-choice bills</a>.</p>
<p>Your calls and emails have gotten us this far, so keep them coming.</p>
<p><strong>The time to protect Maine’s women’s reproductive freedom and privacy is now.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="14" cellpadding="0" width="600">
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/05/heres-the-skinny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Resolution Recognizing International Women&#8217;s Day</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/joint-resolution-recognizing-international-womens-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/joint-resolution-recognizing-international-womens-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coalition for Maine Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Thursday, the Maine House read and adopted a Joint Resolution Recognizing International Women&#8217;s Day on March 8th. This week it&#8217;s on the Senate&#8217;s docket. Here&#8217;s what they are considering: WHEREAS, March 8, 2011 is the 100th anniversary of International Women&#8217;s Day, a globalcelebration of the economic, social and political achievements of women; and WHEREAS,  women are achieving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday, the Maine House read and adopted a Joint Resolution Recognizing International Women&#8217;s Day on March 8th. This week it&#8217;s on the Senate&#8217;s docket. Here&#8217;s what they are considering:</p>
<p>WHEREAS, March 8, 2011 is the 100th anniversary of International Women&#8217;s Day, a globalcelebration of the economic, social and political achievements of women; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  women are achieving at the highest levels of economic, cultural and political life.The percentage of women working in management, business and finance jobs has increased from 9% to14% since 1983; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  women in the United States are enrolled in greater numbers than men in bothundergraduate and graduate institutions and they now comprise about 1/2 of the workforce. Women arethe breadwinners or cobreadwinners in 2/3 of American households. As women&#8217;s earnings have risen, sohas the wellbeing of families; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  as our workforce has been transformed, so too have the highest echelons ofleadership. The vast majority of Americans, 89%, describe themselves as comfortable with women asleaders in all sectors of society; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  despite this progress, significant challenges remain. There continues to be anearnings gap between women and men. At all levels of education, women earned about 75% of what theirmale counterparts earned in 2009, are overrepresented in lowpaying jobs, are more likely than men to livein poverty and carry disproportionate responsibility for care of children and adult family members; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  women are more likely than men to suffer from sexual victimization and intimatepartner violence; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  women are significantly underrepresented in science, technology, engineering andmath, which are areas of significant importance to Maine&#8217;s economic development; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS,  we must seize the opportunity to build on our collective progress and create a futurein which women and girls have every opportunity to succeed and to thrive; now, therefore, be it</p>
<p>RESOLVED: That We, The Members of the One Hundred and Twentyfifth Legislature nowassembled in the First Regular Session, on behalf of the people we represent, take this opportunity todeclare March 8 as International Women&#8217;s Day in Maine. We encourage the people of Maine to celebratethis day with programs and activities that honor the history and accomplishments of Maine women andwill create a more equitable future.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_125th/billpdfs/HP077701.pdf" target="_blank">You can find the text here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/joint-resolution-recognizing-international-womens-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next &#8211; Running with Scissors?</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/whats-next-running-with-sissors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/whats-next-running-with-sissors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine State House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Governor’s roll-back agenda is now reaching into the most basic protections for kids – child labor. No kidding. L.D. 516 would permit employers to hire teen workers and schedule them for unlimited hours during the school year. Representatives from Governor LePage&#8217;s Department of Labor testified in favor of a bill to roll-back wage and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Governor’s roll-back agenda is now reaching into the most basic protections for kids – child labor.</p>
<p>No kidding.</p>
<p>L.D. 516 would permit employers to hire teen workers and schedule them for <strong>unlimited hours during the school year.</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Representatives from Governor  LePage&#8217;s Department of Labor testified in favor of a bill to roll-back  wage and hour protections for Maine youth. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong> That&#8217;s right. It&#8217;s just another in a host of bills aimed at taking us back to the <strong>bad old days</strong> when there were few laws or regulations aimed at protecting the health of Maine children.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=0jZfTIvS3zkakh%2F1Vyb11D5GWKOsl2U%2F" target="_blank">Let&#8217;s not go there. Please contact your legislators and the Governor today</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Maine’s Child Labor Laws were first  enacted in 1847, and strengthened repeatedly over the years. The reason?  Educators saw that the students forced to work long hours outside of  school <strong>were falling asleep in class</strong>.</p>
<p>The current law limiting working hours  for 16 and 17 year-olds was forged in 1991 through bipartisan agreement  about the need to balance employer interests with the health and welfare  of Maine children.</p>
<p>Today, one former teacher testified  about two of her students who worked more than 20 hours a week permitted  by law. They were worn out. Distracted. And &#8211; no surprise &#8211; their  grades suffered.</p>
<p><strong> Gutting child labor laws does nothing to increase jobs.</strong> In fact it will do just the opposite: obstruct students&#8217; success in  school, and put their occupational aspirations at risk. It will harm  their future.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=FP1J4l7jVh3bw0nz7PyI33Vi8PSK96rO" target="_blank">Contact your legislators &#8211; and the Governor &#8211; right now and ask them not to  take us back 20 years</a>.<br />
</strong><br />
Tell them passing this bill is  unconscionable. It will take us back to the days when students are  struggling to stay awake in class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/whats-next-running-with-sissors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Secretary of Labor on Collective Bargaining Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/us-secretary-of-labor-on-collective-bargaining-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/us-secretary-of-labor-on-collective-bargaining-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective Bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilda Solis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just in, U.S. Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, speaks out for unionized workers. The Secretary speaks to her experience as a daughter of two unionized workers and talks about why collective bargaining, or &#8220;sitting at the table&#8221; is a necessary right. That&#8217;s important to remember, particularly now, as states and cities grapple with enormous fiscal challenges, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in, U.S. Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, speaks out for unionized workers. The Secretary speaks to her experience as a daughter of two unionized workers and talks about why collective bargaining, or &#8220;sitting at the table&#8221; is a necessary right.</p>
<blockquote><p>That&#8217;s important to remember, particularly now, as states and cities grapple with enormous fiscal challenges, and everyone must sacrifice to meet those challenges. The public employees who are critical to our communities &#8212; from nurses to teachers to firefighters and police officers &#8212; have made and will continue to make sacrifices to help close budget gaps. But some state leaders have gone too far in the process. Budget sacrifices are one thing; demanding that workers give up their rights as union members &#8212; to take away their voice &#8212; is another.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-hilda-l-solis/at-the-table_b_829501.html" target="_blank">Read the whole piece here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/03/us-secretary-of-labor-on-collective-bargaining-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversity Declines in Governor LePage’s Cabinet</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/01/diversity-declines-in-governor-lepage%e2%80%99s-cabinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/01/diversity-declines-in-governor-lepage%e2%80%99s-cabinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor LePage has now chosen his appointees to head seven of the 15 state departments—and, so far, none of them are women. “Not only does a healthy democracy require diversity in order to be truly representative, but solving the tough problems that Maine currently faces will require leadership, experience, wisdom, and drawing upon all of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor LePage has now chosen his appointees to head seven of the 15 state departments—and, so far, none of them are women.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Not only does a healthy democracy require diversity in order to be truly representative, but solving the tough problems that Maine currently faces will require leadership, experience, wisdom, and drawing upon <em>all </em>of our resources,” said Charlotte Warren, Associate Director. “Going forward, we urge Governor LePage to make a special effort to recruit and consider women at every level. He should do so in the interest of equality—and because ALL Maine people will benefit by policy decisions influenced by diverse voices. Ultimately, we hope to see a Cabinet that is more representative of the population it serves.”</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/assets/files/Diversity%20in%20LePage%20Cabinet%201%2010%202011.pdf" target="_blank">Read all about it, in this press release we sent out today </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2011/01/diversity-declines-in-governor-lepage%e2%80%99s-cabinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CEDAW hearing today!</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/11/cedaw-hearing-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/11/cedaw-hearing-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CEDAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Thursday, November 18th, for the first time in EIGHT years, the United States Senate will hold a hearing focused solely on the importance of ratifying CEDAW – a momentous step forward in our push to ratify this important Treaty. CEDAW, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Thursday, November 18th, for the first time in EIGHT years, the United States Senate will hold a hearing focused solely on the importance of ratifying <a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/cedaw.html" target="_blank">CEDAW</a> – a momentous step forward in our push to ratify this important Treaty.</p>
<p>CEDAW, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, is a landmark international agreement that affirms principles of fundamental human rights and equality for women around the world. CEDAW strengthens the United   States as a global leader in standing up for women and girls in countries around the world.</p>
<p>One of the witnesses at the hearing will be an international activist who uses CEDAW in her home country of Afghanistan to push for progress for women and girls – and she will express her frustration that the U.S. has yet to ratify this important human rights treaty.  This hearing underscores the importance of the U.S. ratifying CEDAW and remaining a world leader on human rights issues and <strong>is an important first step towards holding a VOTE on CEDAW! </strong><strong><br />
</strong><br />
We know that when the United States ratifies CEDAW (the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) it will strengthen us a leader in standing up for women and girls around the world.  We know that Women’s Rights are Human Rights!  We know that we need action from our leaders in Washington, D.C., not just talk.  That’s why we won’t let this CEDAW hearing be the end, but instead the beginning<strong>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/11/cedaw-hearing-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surge of anti-choice women governors</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/11/surge-of-anti-choice-women-governors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/11/surge-of-anti-choice-women-governors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sstandiford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Women's Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[She Decides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go! Happy Election Day.  Don&#8217;t forget to VOTE! (But, you knew that). Something we haven&#8217;t heard a lot about nationally - Women&#8217;s E-news reports today that anti-choice female candidates for governor are poised for big wins. What will this mean for state protections for reproductive rights and access to health care?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go! Happy Election Day.  Don&#8217;t forget to VOTE! (But, you knew that).</p>
<p>Something we haven&#8217;t heard a lot about nationally -<a href="http://womensenews.org/story/campaign-trail/101029/anti-choice-female-governors-poised-gain" target="_blank"> Women&#8217;s E-news</a> reports today that anti-choice female candidates for governor are poised for big wins. What will this mean for state protections for reproductive rights and access to health care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/11/surge-of-anti-choice-women-governors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Spice Guy, Meet SheDecides</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/old-spice-guy-meet-shedecides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/old-spice-guy-meet-shedecides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[She Decides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/old-spice-guy-meet-shedecides/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/old-spice-guy-meet-shedecides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Debates Paycheck Fairness</title>
		<link>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/sarah-debates-paycheck-fairness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/sarah-debates-paycheck-fairness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asheldon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equal Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Women's Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine Women's Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid sick days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christina Hoff Sommers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Standiford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/?p=2181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you hear? Our Executive Director, Sarah Standiford, debated well-known critic of feminism, Christina Hoff Sommers at the Maine School of Law earlier this week. The resolution? The Paycheck Fairness Act. The conclusion? Sarah knocked it out of the house for Paycheck Fairness! Despite Ms. Sommers&#8217; declaration the the legislation is,  a &#8220;mean spirited little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear? Our Executive Director, Sarah Standiford, debated well-known critic of feminism, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers" target="_blank">Christina Hoff Sommers </a>at the Maine School of Law earlier this week. The resolution? <a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/98.html" target="_blank">The Paycheck Fairness Act. </a>The conclusion? Sarah knocked it out of the house for Paycheck Fairness! Despite Ms. Sommers&#8217; declaration the the legislation is,  a &#8220;mean spirited little bill,&#8221; and her belief that, &#8220;Looking at today&#8217;s world you can not call it a patriarchy,&#8221; she was no match for Sarah&#8217;s solid defense of the legislation. Check out some highlights here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/sarah-debates-paycheck-fairness/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Impressed by her introductory remarks? Check out her rebuttal here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/sarah-debates-paycheck-fairness/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Or here!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/sarah-debates-paycheck-fairness/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainewomen.org/blogs/2010/10/sarah-debates-paycheck-fairness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

